![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| UK Finance (uk.finance) Discussion about Finance issues in the UK. |
| Tags: expenses |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5
bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5 bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Tim" wrote in message ... "Lez Pawl" wrote thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5 bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury? Oh for sure and I would stretch it out for a few weeks deliberating...after all, think of those court attendance expenses. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:51:13 -0000, "Lez Pawl"
wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... "Lez Pawl" wrote thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5 bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury? Oh for sure and I would stretch it out for a few weeks deliberating...after all, think of those court attendance expenses. So you've already found them guilty before any trial has even started and before any evidence has been presented and a case for their defence made. Then you complain that other people don't follow proper procedures. Chris |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Chris Blunt" wrote in message news ![]() On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:51:13 -0000, "Lez Pawl" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .. . "Lez Pawl" wrote thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5 bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury? Oh for sure and I would stretch it out for a few weeks deliberating...after all, think of those court attendance expenses. So you've already found them guilty before any trial has even started and before any evidence has been presented and a case for their defence made. Then you complain that other people don't follow proper procedures. Chris yyyaaaawwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:29:46 -0000, "Tim" wrote:
"Lez Pawl" wrote thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5 bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury? But if the crooks have their way it won't come to a jury. If they indeed get off by claiming parliamentary privilege they're dragging politics even mor into the mire. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5 bloody years before. and will they be found guilty.................NO. "Tim" wrote You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury? "Lez Pawl" wrote: Oh for sure... "Chris Blunt" wrote So you've already found them guilty... No, he's agreed (see above) that he'd find them NOT Guilty !! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|