A UK money and finance forum. Finance Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Finance Banter forum » UK Finance Newsgroups » UK Finance
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK Finance (uk.finance) Discussion about Finance issues in the UK.

Tags:

MP expenses



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th 10, 01:45 PM posted to uk.finance
Lez Pawl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default MP expenses

thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages that had finished....5
bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.



Ads
  #2  
Old February 5th 10, 03:29 PM posted to uk.finance
Tim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,053
Default MP expenses

"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages
that had finished....5 bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.


You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury?


  #3  
Old February 5th 10, 03:51 PM posted to uk.finance
Lez Pawl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default MP expenses


"Tim" wrote in message
...
"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages
that had finished....5 bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.


You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury?



Oh for sure and I would stretch it out for a few weeks deliberating...after
all, think of those court attendance expenses.


  #4  
Old February 6th 10, 01:07 AM posted to uk.finance
Chris Blunt[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 151
Default MP expenses

On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:51:13 -0000, "Lez Pawl"
wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
...
"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages
that had finished....5 bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.


You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury?



Oh for sure and I would stretch it out for a few weeks deliberating...after
all, think of those court attendance expenses.


So you've already found them guilty before any trial has even started
and before any evidence has been presented and a case for their
defence made. Then you complain that other people don't follow proper
procedures.

Chris
  #5  
Old February 6th 10, 06:12 AM posted to uk.finance
Lez Pawl
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default MP expenses


"Chris Blunt" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:51:13 -0000, "Lez Pawl"
wrote:


"Tim" wrote in message
.. .
"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages
that had finished....5 bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.

You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury?



Oh for sure and I would stretch it out for a few weeks
deliberating...after
all, think of those court attendance expenses.


So you've already found them guilty before any trial has even started
and before any evidence has been presented and a case for their
defence made. Then you complain that other people don't follow proper
procedures.

Chris



yyyaaaawwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.


  #6  
Old February 6th 10, 11:15 AM posted to uk.finance
Tiddy Ogg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 414
Default MP expenses

On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:29:46 -0000, "Tim" wrote:

"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages
that had finished....5 bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.


You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury?

But if the crooks have their way it won't come to a jury.
If they indeed get off by claiming parliamentary privilege they're
dragging politics even mor into the mire.
  #7  
Old February 6th 10, 12:12 PM posted to uk.finance
Tim
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,053
Default MP expenses

"Lez Pawl" wrote
thieving gits especially those claiming for mortgages
that had finished....5 bloody years before.

and will they be found guilty.................NO.

"Tim" wrote
You'd find them Not Guilty if you were on the jury?


"Lez Pawl" wrote:
Oh for sure...


"Chris Blunt" wrote
So you've already found them guilty...


No, he's agreed (see above) that he'd find them NOT Guilty !!


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2010 Finance Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Find jobs - Wordpress Themes - Internet Dating - Credit Consolidation - Credit Consolidation