![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| UK Finance (uk.finance) Discussion about Finance issues in the UK. |
| Tags: safe, sipp |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Imagine, if you will, someone who has a 'Final Salary Scheme' pension with his employer but the fund is in severe deficit which seems to be growing year by year. Imagine also that the employee is worried that the company might default at some point and fail to make up the deficit. imagine that at the moment the employee can withdraw 100% of his (actuarily calculated) pot and put it into a SIPP. If he does this, and invest in stocks and shares etc. in the SIPP, how safe is that investment? Is it possible for the SIPP management company to default in some way or is his investment 'ring fenced' in some way? many thanks for any views on this Robert |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RobertL" wrote in message ... Imagine, if you will, someone who has a 'Final Salary Scheme' pension with his employer but the fund is in severe deficit which seems to be growing year by year. Imagine also that the employee is worried that the company might default at some point and fail to make up the deficit. imagine that at the moment the employee can withdraw 100% of his (actuarily calculated) pot and put it into a SIPP. If he does this, and invest in stocks and shares etc. in the SIPP, how safe is that investment? Is it possible for the SIPP management company to default in some way or is his investment 'ring fenced' in some way? The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. tim |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 14, 4:19*pm, "tim...." wrote:
"RobertL" wrote in message ... Imagine, if you will, *someone who has a 'Final Salary Scheme' pension with his employer but the fund is in severe deficit which seems to be growing year by year. *Imagine also that the employee is worried that the company might default at some point and fail to make up the deficit. *imagine that at the moment the employee can withdraw 100% of his (actuarily calculated) pot and put it into a SIPP. If he does this, and invest in stocks and shares etc. in the SIPP, how safe is that investment? * Is it possible for the SIPP management company to default in some way or is his investment 'ring fenced' in some way? The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. *It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. tim thank you, yes, the typically fixed annual fee means that these things are only sensible if the fund is reasonably large. they don't guard against poor investment decisions either, as you point out. Robert |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RobertL wrote:
Imagine, if you will, someone who has a 'Final Salary Scheme' pension with his employer but the fund is in severe deficit which seems to be growing year by year. Imagine also that the employee is worried that the company might default at some point and fail to make up the deficit. imagine that at the moment the employee can withdraw 100% of his (actuarily calculated) pot and put it into a SIPP. If he does this, and invest in stocks and shares etc. in the SIPP, how safe is that investment? Is it possible for the SIPP management company to default in some way or is his investment 'ring fenced' in some way? many thanks for any views on this Robert You appear to be specifying a SIPP as the only option. What about an ordinary personal pension? The pension plan is basically safe even if the provider went under (the provider does not actually 'own' the pension), but the funds themselves have a riosk element that depends on which funds they are. If you wanted low or no risk then you could choose a cash fund (but the returns would likely be abysmal). Plus the charges are likely to be less than with a SIPP. Rob Graham |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RobertL" wrote in message ... The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. thank you, yes, the typically fixed annual fee means that these things are only sensible if the fund is reasonably large. they don't guard against poor investment decisions either, as you point out. Go for one without a fixed annual management fee, eg Hargreaves Landsdown. I think others like sippdeal have reasonable charges too. -- Andy |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tim...." wrote in message ... "RobertL" wrote in message ... Imagine, if you will, someone who has a 'Final Salary Scheme' pension with his employer but the fund is in severe deficit which seems to be growing year by year. Imagine also that the employee is worried that the company might default at some point and fail to make up the deficit. imagine that at the moment the employee can withdraw 100% of his (actuarily calculated) pot and put it into a SIPP. If he does this, and invest in stocks and shares etc. in the SIPP, how safe is that investment? Is it possible for the SIPP management company to default in some way or is his investment 'ring fenced' in some way? The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. My wife has a SIPP with HL - about £10k in it. The charges are insignificant (in fact there are no charges at the moment other than the annual charge on the underlying funds). -- Andy |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
tim.... wrote:
The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. tim Just checking I understand - the ownership of the funds is with the person rather than the SIPP admin company. So it the admin company goes broke then the SIPP (funds?) still exists and belongs to the person - I presume its just transferred to another admin company? However if the places that the SIPP is invested in - say the whole lot is in a cash fund - go broke then the usual rules apply - e.g. bank deposit guarantee? Have I got it? mikej |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike James" wrote in message . uk... tim.... wrote: The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. tim Just checking I understand - the ownership of the funds is with the person rather than the SIPP admin company. So it the admin company goes broke then the SIPP (funds?) still exists and belongs to the person - I presume its just transferred to another admin company? However if the places that the SIPP is invested in - say the whole lot is in a cash fund - go broke then the usual rules apply - e.g. bank deposit guarantee? Have I got it? yep, that's how it works tim |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Jan 15, 12:38*pm, "tim...." wrote:
"Mike James" wrote in message . uk... tim.... wrote: The SIPP is 100% safe wrt the "ownership" of the funds. *It is however not guaranteed to give to a positive return and may return a negative amount, especially after management fees which can be significant for small amounts. Small in SIPP terms is perhaps less than 50-100K. tim Just checking I understand - the ownership of the funds is with the person rather than the SIPP admin company. So it the admin company goes broke then the SIPP (funds?) still exists and belongs to the person - I presume its just transferred to another admin company? However if the places that the SIPP is invested in - say the whole lot is in a cash fund - go broke then the usual rules apply - e.g. bank deposit guarantee? Have I got it? yep, that's how it works Good. i wasn't concerned about the health underlying investments but rather about the SIPP wrapper provider. The other question I need to sort out (by reading further) is what happens if the SIPPer dies. I know there is a possible large tax charge under some circumstances. Robert |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"RobertL" wrote in message ... On Jan 15, 12:38 pm, "tim...." wrote: Good. i wasn't concerned about the health underlying investments but rather about the SIPP wrapper provider. The other question I need to sort out (by reading further) is what happens if the SIPPer dies. I know there is a possible large tax charge under some circumstances. If you haven't vested and are within the lifetime limit (which is very large) then it goes 100% tax free into the estate AIUI. -- Andy |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|