![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| UK Finance (uk.finance) Discussion about Finance issues in the UK. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message , Fergus O'Rourke
wrote I am not authorised to give investment advice :-) But I am inclined to agree with yours, with the rider that the OP keep a very keen eye on the behaviour of the trustees. He may think it's more expedient to get a private pension instead, or even forego the tax relief and invest directly. If an employer has a final salary scheme and also puts money into the pot then it is unlikely the employer will contribute anything to a private pension. -- Alan news2009 {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
| Ads |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Surely the 2008 act did not force employers to do this; it merely enabled them to do it. Or did I misunderstand it? No; yes[1]. There's long been a statutory cap on most such schemes and it's been cut to 2.5%. From the Explanatory Note to the 2008 Act: "241. The overall effect of the amendments is to provide that accrued benefit attributable to pensionable service on or after the commencement day is to be revalued by the rate of inflation over the relevant revaluation period, capped at 2.5% per annum. Accrued benefit attributable to service before the commencement day is to be unaffected by the amendments and a cap of 5% per annum is to continue to be applied to accrued benefits for service between 1985 and the commencement day." [1] sorry, what I really meant to say, in line with the statutory requirement to foster a no-blame culture in which everyone's contribution is not merely recognised and rewarded but selected for affirmative grovelling by any white male over 50, was that your understanding was both perfectly valid and an insightful comment on the inadequacy of my (no doubt culturally and sexually biased) previous attempt to communicate ![]() -- R |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
DB. wrote:
"BigGirlsBlouse" wrote in message ... "rick stevens" wrote in message ... Hi Not sure if this is the right newsgroup to ask this, but here goes. As part of a TUPE process, I have been given a one off chance to join my new employers final salary pension scheme. The information I have says your pension is based on your pensionable service, and final pensionable pay in last 12 months. The formula to calculate the pension is 1/60 x fpp x ps. What exactly is pensionable service? Is it the number of years I have been in the scheme? Also, I am now 45, and have no other pension provision, is this worth doing? thanks for any advice Rick IMHO you grab it quick before the employer takes it away. remainder snipped You clearly know much about these matters, Rick. I've been retired many years and was on a final-salary scheme when I was working. My pension is index-linked. I've not noticed any mention of index-linking when these matters are discussed here. Is I/L implicit in a F/S scheme, or am I just fortunate? Sadly, my wife dumped me some years ago but my scheme would have given my widow a 'half-pension' for her remaining years. Is that common with these schemes? Index linking depends on the scheme specifics - as does 'death in service' payments and widows pensions etc. For example, I have just been advised that my RPI-linked pension will not be -1.2% this year but 0%. And that the offset 1.2% will not be clawed back next year. Read the conditions very carefully. Then, if you want further advice, post them all here. But it does look as though this is a gift horse. But even they can be terminal. Flop |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|