Clifford Frisby wrote:

mick wrote:

However the recession officially began with 3 consecutive
negative growth qtrs.What if the 1st qtr of 2010 is negative? Are we
back in recession then? or do we have to wait another 6 months.

ISTR it's *two* consecutive quarters, not three, but in any case...

I was just thinking something similar, and about to post the question: why
does it require two consecutive quarters for it to be considered that a
recession has started,

Because if it's just one it can be dismissed as a blip, whereas if it's
two, it's more difficult to hide.

and yet only one quarter of positive growth to exit that recession.

Whilst one could, and arguably should, argue along the same lines as
above, that just one could simply be a blip, you have to remember the
psychology of spin. Good news, however little, always gives cause
for optimism, whereas bad news needs to be staring you in the face
before it can wipe the smile off it.